My mother believed that a well-kept yard said something definitive about a person’s character.
Not the expensive kind of yard, not the kind that required a landscape service and seasonal consultations and the specific manicured perfection of a property that was trying to communicate wealth. The honest kind. The yard of someone who understood that the things you grew required attention and that the attention demonstrated something about who you were.
Her yard was that kind of yard.
She had tended it for forty years in the house on Birchwood Lane where I had grown up and where she had lived alone after my father died, when I was twelve, and where she had cultivated a garden that was genuinely beautiful in the specific way of gardens that are tended by someone who loves them without trying to impress anyone.
Roses along the south fence.
A vegetable garden on the east side that produced more tomatoes than she could eat and that she gave away each August.
Perennials that came back reliably every spring.
And the red maple.
She had planted the red maple twenty-seven years ago, in the same year that I married Joe, and I had never connected those two events until I was standing in her backyard at ten at night with a shovel, which is when certain connections you have avoided making finally become visible.
She had planted it herself, she told me at the time, because she wanted something that would grow.
She said it the way she said things that had a second layer, that were true on the surface and meant something more underneath.
I was twenty-six when she planted it.
I was not wise enough then to hear the second layer.
My name is Sarah.
I have been married to Joe Beaumont for twenty-seven years.
He is a good husband in the ways that matter for daily life.
He comes home when he says he will.
He has been employed, reliably, as a finishing carpenter for most of our marriage, the specific kind of skilled trade that produces a comfortable income and that creates the material evidence of a life well maintained.
We have two daughters.
Nora is twenty-four and lives in Portland.
Caitlin is twenty-one and is finishing her last year at a state school three hours from us.
We have a house.
We have a dog named Copper who is nine and who sleeps at the foot of the bed.
We have, by most visible measures, a good marriage.
And for twenty-seven years, my husband and my mother hated each other with a consistency and a depth that I had attributed to personality conflict and class difference and the specific chemistry of two people who occupied incompatible social categories.
I was wrong about the reason.
I was wrong about many things.
I want to tell this story accurately, which means I want to tell the part about my mother first, because to understand what was buried under the red maple you have to understand who planted it and why.
My mother’s name was Margaret Hollis.
She was born in 1944 in a small town in upstate New York, the second of four children, to parents who were not particularly warm but who were functional in the specific Depression-era way of people who understood that function was the whole job.
She married my father in 1965.
He was Douglas Hollis, an accountant, and they had been happy in the specific measured way of two people who are compatible rather than passionate, who have chosen each other carefully rather than impulsively and who are glad, daily, about the care they took.
He died in 1983 of a heart attack at forty-four.
I was twelve.
My mother was thirty-nine.
She was widowed with a twelve-year-old daughter and a house and a small business she had been building for three years, a financial consulting firm that she had started because she was good with numbers and because she understood, watching her husband’s health decline, that she needed something of her own.
She built it alone.
She was not the kind of woman who remarried.
She was the kind of woman who channeled the energy that other women put into relationships into the business and the yard and the maintenance of a life that was self-sufficient and controlled and that did not depend on anyone else’s reliability.
I admired this.
I also, I understand now, learned some of the wrong lessons from it.
I learned that a woman should be able to manage everything herself.
I learned that needing was a vulnerability.
What I did not learn, because she did not teach it, was when to ask for help.
When to tell someone something that was difficult.
When the management of a situation had reached a point that required the involvement of another person.
I had not learned this, and when I met Joe at twenty-three and married him at twenty-six, I had not learned it yet, and neither had she.
The first meeting between Joe and my mother was at a dinner in September of 1996.
I was twenty-five and Joe was twenty-eight.
We had been together for eight months.
I had told her about him in general terms, the way you tell a parent about someone you are seriously seeing when you are not entirely sure how they will respond, which is to manage the information rather than release it fully.
She had responded with the specific controlled warmth of a woman who understood that her reaction would affect her relationship with her daughter and who was therefore deploying the warmth deliberately.
She had cooked dinner.
She had been pleasant.
And Joe had been pleasant.
And underneath the pleasantness of both of them, something had been happening that I had not seen.
Or had not let myself see.
Because I remember, now, from the specific height of twenty-seven more years of knowing both of them, that the dinner had ended differently than it had begun.
It had begun with warmth and ended with restraint.
My mother had become quieter over the course of the meal.
Joe had become louder.
They had not argued.
But they had arrived, by dessert, at the specific arrangement of two people who have understood something about each other and who have decided, independently, not to say it.
I had thought: they are different kinds of people. They will warm up over time.
They did not warm up.
They maintained, for twenty-seven years, the civil hostility of two people who had agreed implicitly to coexist for the sake of someone they both loved.
Once, seven years in, I overheard my mother say to Joe: you know exactly what you did.
Joe had gone silent.
I had been in the next room.
I had made the decision, in that moment, not to go in.
I do not know exactly why.
I think I was afraid of what would be said.
I think I had organized my life around the fiction that the conflict between them was personality-based rather than event-based, and that to hear the event would be to have to do something about it.
So I stayed in the next room.
And I did not ask.
And it became, over time, the thing I did not ask about, the specific unasked question that organized itself into furniture in the room of our family life, that everyone stepped around because everyone had agreed, without saying so, to step around it.
My mother died in March.
She had been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in November and she had lasted four months, which was longer than they had expected and which she had spent, characteristically, managing her affairs with the specific efficiency of someone who was not going to leave anything unresolved.
She had revised her will.
She had organized her papers.
She had arranged for the house and its contents to be dealt with according to specific instructions she left with her lawyer.
She had said goodbye to Nora and Caitlin in a way that was loving and clear.
She had said goodbye to me in a way that I could not fully decode.
She had held my hand and she had said: you have been the best thing in my life.
She had said: I want you to know the truth.
I had said: what truth?
She had said: I was going to tell you. I wanted to tell you.
And then she had drifted, the specific drifting of someone very close to the end, and she had not finished the sentence, and those were the last words she said to me that made complete sense.
I want you to know the truth.
The funeral was on a Saturday in late March.
Joe had stood beside me throughout.
He had held my hand during the service.
He had been present at the reception in exactly the way a good husband is present at such events, attentive and available and not taking up more space than was appropriate.
I had been grateful.
And then I had noticed he was gone.
I went looking for him.
The funeral home had a room off the main reception hall where the open casket had been placed for those who wanted a viewing before the service, and the door was ajar when I came to it.
I heard his voice.
He said: I kept our secret, Margaret.
He said: no one ever found out.
He touched the edge of the coffin.
He said: it’ll stay buried under the red maple in your yard forever.
I stepped back.
I stood in the hallway.
My heart was doing something I could not control.
I stood there until I heard him move toward the door and then I moved away, quickly, the way you move when you need someone not to know you heard something.
I went back to the reception.
I held a cup of tea I did not drink.
I talked to relatives about my mother’s life.
I watched Joe across the room.
He was talking to someone.
He was smiling in the way he smiled at social events, the easy social smile of someone who is comfortable in rooms full of people.
I watched him and I thought about the red maple.
I had always assumed my mother’s attachment to it was sentimental.
She had planted it in a significant year, the year I married, and she had treated it with a protectiveness that I had attributed to the sentimentality of a woman who did not express sentiment in any other form.
She would not let landscapers near it.
She refused to have it removed when the roots cracked part of the walkway, which cost her money to repair and which Joe had commented on once, saying she should just have the tree taken out.
My mother had looked at Joe for a long moment.
She had said: that tree stays where it is.
Joe had not said anything else.
I had attributed this to their general antagonism.
Now I sat in the funeral home with a cup of tea and thought about a woman who planted a tree to mark something she needed to keep buried.
That night I drove to Birchwood Lane.
The house was empty.
I had been there two days before to collect some of my mother’s personal items, and the emptiness had a different quality now, the specific emptiness of a house whose person was not coming back rather than simply out.
The porch light was on because I had left it on.
The maple stood behind the house.
I had looked at it thousands of times.
It was a beautiful tree.
Big, now, after twenty-seven years, with the specific established quality of a tree that has had time.
The canopy was wide.
The trunk was substantial.
It had the look of a tree that had been given something, that had been placed with intention.
I found the shovel in the garage.
I put on the work gloves that were on the shelf beside the shovel.
I went to the tree.
I started digging.
The roots were complex and the soil was compacted from decades of being root-threaded, and for fifteen minutes I moved through just roots and damp soil and thought: maybe I misheard. Maybe he said something else. Maybe I am about to feel ridiculous.
Then the blade hit metal.
The sound was specific and clear and nothing like root or stone.
I dug around it.
I pulled it up.
A metal container, the kind that was made to be buried, that was sealed against moisture, wrapped in layers of plastic bag that had degraded but had done their job.
I carried it to the porch.
My hands were shaking.
I opened it.
Inside was a folder.
And inside the folder were documents.
The first document was a police report.
It was dated August 14, 1996.
Fourteen months before I married Joe.
The name on the report was Joseph Beaumont.
My Joe.
The offense was assault.
I read it.
I read it twice.
The victim was a woman named Clare Ashby.
The report described an incident at a bar, an escalation, a physical confrontation in which Joseph Beaumont had struck Clare Ashby and broken her nose.
See more on the next page
